Ask HN: Do you know uninteresting but useful scientific discoveries?

Ask HN: Do you know uninteresting but useful scientific discoveries?
4 by wamo | 1 comments on Hacker News.
I'm having mixed feelings about the starting assumption of the article "That's interesting!" by sociologist Murray S. Davis. The starting assumption is that it is desirable for scientists to produce interesting theories. Is it really? The article goes on to analyze what makes a proposition interesting and what makes one non-interesting. Do you have examples that contradict the assumption that interesting is necessarily desirable in science? Can you think of non-interesting scientific propositions that were very useful?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lord of the Rings Influenced a Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty Quest

Lord of the Rings Fans Mourn King Théoden Actor Bernard Hill, Dead at 79

Redfall's Final Update Is Live, Bringing With It Offline Mode, DLSS 3, and More